Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 75188 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.22 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 190 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 156,3 х 75,4 х 9,4 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb: Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 12/512GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi 8’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 75188 score points which is 94.31% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 173 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 49.14% faster. In "Multi-core" score 779 vs 603 (29.19% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 94.31% faster in the Antutu test (36493 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp Sony IMX486 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 41 grams less (149 vs 190).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Redmi 8 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6 vs Xiaomi Redmi 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Xiaomi Redmi 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7 Global vs Xiaomi Redmi 8
- Compare Elephone Soldier vs Xiaomi Redmi 8
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus