Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 732887 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4520 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 196 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 6/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi 11i - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 12/512GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4520 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 732887 score points which is 1794.01% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1132 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 875.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3847 vs 603 (537.98% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1794.01% faster in the Antutu test (694192 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp Samsung S5K3T2 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 47 grams less (149 vs 196).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4520mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F3
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus