Compare Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Zopo Color X5.5
| Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Zopo Color X5.5 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 38695 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6737 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal |
| Weight | 149 g | 166 g |
| Dimensions | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm | 155 x 77.8 x 8.7 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Zopo models here
Alternatives to the Zopo Color X5.5: |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Zopo Color X5.5: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor E’s camera vs Zopo Color X5.5’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Zopo Color X5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Zopo Color X5.5: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor E vs Zopo Color X5.5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb | Zopo Color X5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Zopo Color X5.5: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 38695 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Zopo Color X5.5, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb vs Zopo Color X5.5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Zopo Color X5.5 which got 106, it is 9.43% faster. In "Multi-core" score 603 vs 369 (63.41% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb and Zopo Color X5.5? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 17 grams less (149 vs 166).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2520mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Zopo Color X5.5 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
Why it is better not to take Zopo Color X5.5 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus