0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with AGM M5.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb AGM M5
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb AGM M5
Antutu benchmark 37524 30188
CPU MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210
Diagonal size 5 " 2.8 "
Resolution 1280x720 320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 2
RAM 3 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 2 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp Mp
Battery 2800 mAh 2500 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 2 G
WiFi Yes No
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 6.0 Android 8.1
Material Metal and plastic Plastics and rubber
Weight 140 g 173 g
Dimensions 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm 155 x 64 x 16.2 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:
81.09€ ($85.52) See Details

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs AGM M5’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 2Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb AGM M5
Rear camera 13 Mp 2 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash No
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp Mp
Flash No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs AGM M5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb AGM M5
Battery 2800 mAh 2500 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 20 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 24.30% faster than the AGM M5, which got 30188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
AGM M5
2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh
81.09€
$85.52
 

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs AGM M5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M5 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
AGM M5
2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh
81.09€
$85.52
 

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and AGM M5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 24.30% faster in the Antutu test (7336 score difference).
  • Best weight: 33 grams less (140 vs 173).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 2Mp
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
  • More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 300mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)

  • Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

AGM M5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.61/5 of 425
Frequent comparisons