Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV9600 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 144611 | 37524 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.21 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2248х1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P8 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 234 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 162,9 x 81,4 x 12,85 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price | 249.99€ ($268.22) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV9600 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9600’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P8 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9600 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P8 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9600 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9600 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9600 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV9600 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9600 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 144611 score points which is 285.38% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9600 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9600 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 307 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 164.66% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1343 vs 604 (122.35% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9600 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9600 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 285.38% faster in the Antutu test (107087 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P8 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp Sony IMX134 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2248х1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2780mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9600 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 94 grams less (140 vs 234).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BV9600 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Blackview BV9600
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Blackview BV9600
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6000
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Blackview BV9600
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Blackview BV9600
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro