Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Blackview BV9900E with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.
Name	Blackview BV9900E	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	171897	37524
CPU	MediaTek Helio P90	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	5.84 "	5 "
Resolution	2340x1080	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	6 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX582
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4380 mAh	2800 mAh
Wireless charging	Yes
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 6.0
Material	Plastics and rubber	Metal and plastic
Weight	264 g	140 g
Dimensions	156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
Price	244.96€ ($255.36) See Details	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9900E’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Blackview BV9900E	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX582
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Blackview BV9900E	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery	4380 mAh	2800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	30 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	Yes

Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Blackview BV9900E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 171897 score points which is 358.10% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Blackview BV9900E

5.84 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio P90 / 6Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 4380mAh

244.96€

$255.36

171897

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Blackview BV9900E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 393 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 238.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1426 vs 604 (136.09% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Blackview BV9900E

5.84 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio P90 / 6Gb / 128GB / 48Mp Sony IMX582 / 4380mAh

244.96€

$255.36

393 / 1426

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

What is the difference between Blackview BV9900E and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9900E (advantages)

Good performance: Is 358.10% faster in the Antutu test (134373 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 4380mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1580mAh).
Have water resistant supports.
Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9900E (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 124 grams less (140 vs 264).
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.
Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.

Blackview BV9900E related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 162

Frequent comparisons