Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 171897 | 37524 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 264 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price | 238.78€ ($255.36) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9900E’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9900E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 171897 score points which is 358.10% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9900E vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9900E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 393 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 238.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1426 vs 604 (136.09% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9900E and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9900E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 358.10% faster in the Antutu test (134373 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4380mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1580mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9900E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 124 grams less (140 vs 264).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview BV9900E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G
- Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Doogee S96 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Blackview BV9900E
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro