0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot R15 Pro with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Cubot R15 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Cubot R15 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 49811 37524
CPU MediaTek Helio A22 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.26 " 5 "
Resolution 1520x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 3 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 32 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 6.0
Material Plastic Metal and plastic
Weight 173 g 140 g
Dimensions 157,8 x 77 x 9,1 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot R15 Pro:
Cubot King Kong Star - Compare
Cubot P60 - Compare
Cubot Note 30 - Compare
Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot R15 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot R15 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot R15 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 3000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 25 hours 20 hours
Fast charging No Yes
Wireless charging No

Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot R15 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 49811 score points which is 32.74% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot R15 Pro
6.26 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Cubot R15 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot R15 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 38.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 538 vs 604 (-10.93% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot R15 Pro
6.26 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio A22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Cubot R15 Pro and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot R15 Pro (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 32.74% faster in the Antutu test (12287 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot R15 Pro (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 33 grams less (140 vs 173).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot R15 Pro related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.25/5 of 20
Frequent comparisons