Compare LG K10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

LG K10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG K10 with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.
Name	LG K10	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	52177	37524
CPU	MediaTek MT6750	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	5.3 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	2 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	2300 mAh	2800 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0	Android 6.0
Material	Plastic	Metal and plastic
Weight	142 g	140 g
Dimensions	148,7 x 75,3 x 8 mm	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
Price	149.90€ ($172.02) See Details	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

LG K10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG K10’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	LG K10	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

LG K10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K10 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	LG K10	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery	2300 mAh	2800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No

LG K10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG K10 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 52177 score points which is 39.05% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG K10

5.3 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2300mAh

149.90€

$172.02

52177

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

LG K10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG K10 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 0.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 624 vs 604 (3.31% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG K10

5.3 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2300mAh

149.90€

$172.02

116 / 624

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

What is the difference between LG K10 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K10 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 39.05% faster in the Antutu test (14653 score difference).
NFC supports.

Why it is better not to take LG K10 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 2 grams less (140 vs 142).
More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2300mAh (a difference of 500mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG K10 related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons