Compare LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG V60 ThinQ with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.
Name	LG V60 ThinQ	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	597255	37524
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	6.8 "	5 "
Resolution	2460x1080	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	8 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	64 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Samsung GW1
dxomark mobile ranking	100
dxomark (photo)	103
dxomark (video)	93
Front (selfie) camera	10 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5000 mAh	2800 mAh
Wireless charging	Yes
Network	5 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 6.0
Material	Metal frame and glass case	Metal and plastic
Weight	214 g	140 g
Dimensions	169,3 x 77,6 x 8,9 mm	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
Price	390.47€ ($450.00) See Details	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG V60 ThinQ’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	LG V60 ThinQ	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera	64 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Samsung GW1
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	10 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	LG V60 ThinQ	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery	5000 mAh	2800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	30 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	Yes

LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG V60 ThinQ in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 597255 score points which is 1491.66% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG V60 ThinQ

6.8inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 5000mAh

390.47€

$450.00

597255

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

LG V60 ThinQ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG V60 ThinQ in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 893 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 669.83% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3321 vs 604 (449.83% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG V60 ThinQ

6.8inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Samsung GW1 / 5000mAh

390.47€

$450.00

893 / 3321

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

What is the difference between LG V60 ThinQ and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG V60 ThinQ (advantages)

Good performance: Is 1491.66% faster in the Antutu test (559731 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).
Have water resistant supports.
Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take LG V60 ThinQ (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 74 grams less (140 vs 214).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.
Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG V60 ThinQ related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.00/5 of 5

Frequent comparisons