Compare Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Motorola Moto One 5G Ace | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 323154 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 212 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9,9 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto One 5G Ace: Motorola Edge 30 Ultra 8/128GB - Compare Motorola Moto G42 6/128GB - Compare Motorola Razr 5G - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto One 5G Ace’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Motorola Moto One 5G Ace | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Motorola Moto One 5G Ace | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 323154 score points which is 761.19% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 604 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 420.69% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1905 vs 604 (215.40% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola Moto One 5G Ace and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto One 5G Ace (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 761.19% faster in the Antutu test (285630 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto One 5G Ace (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 72 grams less (140 vs 212).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Motorola Moto One 5G Ace related comparisons
- Compare OnePlus Nord N10 5G vs Motorola Moto One 5G Ace
- Compare Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Motorola One Vision
- Compare Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Motorola Razr 5G
- Compare Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Compare Motorola Moto One 5G Ace vs Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro