0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nomu M8 with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Nomu M8 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Nomu M8 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 50855 37524
CPU MediaTek MT6750T MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 5.2 " 5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 4 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 64 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 7.1 Android 6.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal and plastic
Weight 157 g 140 g
Dimensions 150,7 x 74,8 x 9,9 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price 121.25€ ($129.34) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nomu M8’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nomu M8 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Four LEDs LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 5 Mp
Flash LED flash No

Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nomu M8 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 3000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 25 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nomu M8 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 50855 score points which is 35.53% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nomu M8
5.2 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6750T / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh
121.25€
$129.34
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Nomu M8 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nomu M8 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 123 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 6.03% faster. In "Multi-core" score 632 vs 604 (4.64% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nomu M8
5.2 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6750T / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh
121.25€
$129.34
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Nomu M8 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nomu M8 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 35.53% faster in the Antutu test (13331 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
  • Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Nomu M8 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 17 grams less (140 vs 157).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

Nomu M8 related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.44/5 of 25
Frequent comparisons