0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Find X2 with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Oppo Find X2 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Oppo Find X2 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 505499 37524
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.7 " 5 "
Resolution 3168x1440 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 12 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 256 GB 16 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX586
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4200 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 6.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal and plastic
Weight 180 g 140 g
Dimensions 164.9 x 74.5 x 8.7 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price 899.00€ ($1038.30) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Find X2’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Find X2 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX586
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Find X2 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 4200 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Find X2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 505499 score points which is 1247.14% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Find X2
6.7" (3168x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 12Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4200mAh
899.00€
$1038.30
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Oppo Find X2 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Find X2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 913 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 687.07% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3308 vs 604 (447.68% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Find X2
6.7" (3168x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 / 12Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4200mAh
899.00€
$1038.30
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Oppo Find X2 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Find X2 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 1247.14% faster in the Antutu test (467975 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 3168x1440 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).

Why it is better not to take Oppo Find X2 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 40 grams less (140 vs 180).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

Oppo Find X2 related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.82/5 of 11
Frequent comparisons