Compare Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Oppo Realme Harzo 10 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 198993 | 37524 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G80 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 195 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75 x 9 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Realme Harzo 10: Oppo A31 - Compare Oppo Reno 5 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 8/256Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Realme Harzo 10’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Realme Harzo 10 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Realme Harzo 10 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 198993 score points which is 430.31% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 387 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 233.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1348 vs 604 (123.18% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Realme Harzo 10 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Realme Harzo 10 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 430.31% faster in the Antutu test (161469 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).
Why it is better not to take Oppo Realme Harzo 10 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 55 grams less (140 vs 195).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Oppo Realme Harzo 10 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 vs Oppo Realme Harzo 10
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs Oppo Realme Harzo 10
- Compare Oppo Realme 5 vs Oppo Realme Harzo 10
- Compare Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Oppo A9 2020
- Compare Oppo Realme Harzo 10 vs Huawei Honor Play 9A
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro