0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Reno 3 with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Oppo Reno 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Oppo Reno 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 502188 37524
CPU MediaTek Dimensity 1000 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.4 " 5 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 12 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 16 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4035 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 6.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal and plastic
Weight 181 g 140 g
Dimensions 160.3 x 74.3 x 7.96 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price 207.29€ ($223.32) See Details Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno 3’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Reno 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX686
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Reno 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 4035 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 502188 score points which is 1238.31% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Reno 3
6.4" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 1000 / 12Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4035mAh
207.29€
$223.32
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Oppo Reno 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 785 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 576.72% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3023 vs 604 (400.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Reno 3
6.4" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 1000 / 12Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4035mAh
207.29€
$223.32
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Oppo Reno 3 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 1238.31% faster in the Antutu test (464664 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4035mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1235mAh).

Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 3 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 41 grams less (140 vs 181).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Oppo Reno 3 related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.69/5 of 16
Frequent comparisons