Compare Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 329333 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4020 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 172 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 72.5 x 7.6 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB: Oppo Find X5 8/256GB - Compare Oppo Reno8 5G 12/256GB - Compare Oppo Find X6 Pro 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno 4 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno 4 Pro vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4020 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 329333 score points which is 777.66% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 672 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 479.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1993 vs 604 (229.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 777.66% faster in the Antutu test (291809 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4020mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1220mAh).
Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 32 grams less (140 vs 172).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Oppo Reno 4 Pro 12/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno 6 Pro vs Oppo Reno 4 Pro
- Compare Oppo Reno 4 Pro vs Oppo Reno6 4G
- Compare Oppo Reno 4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Oppo Reno 4 Pro
- Compare Oppo Reno 4 Pro vs Oppo Reno5 Lite
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro