0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Oppo Reno Ace 3 with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Oppo Reno Ace 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Oppo Reno Ace 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 641558 37524
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.59 " 5 "
Resolution 2400x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 12 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 512 GB 16 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4500 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 6.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal and plastic
Weight g 140 g
Dimensions mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno Ace 3:
Oppo Reno 9 Pro 5G - Compare
Oppo Reno 4 5G 8/128Gb - Compare
Oppo Reno8 Pro+ 12/256GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno Ace 3’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Oppo Reno Ace 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX686
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Oppo Reno Ace 3 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 4500 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno Ace 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 641558 score points which is 1609.73% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Oppo Reno Ace 3
6.59" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 Plus / 12Gb / 512GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Oppo Reno Ace 3 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Oppo Reno Ace 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 949 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 718.10% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3671 vs 604 (507.78% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Oppo Reno Ace 3
6.59" (2400x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 865 Plus / 12Gb / 512GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Oppo Reno Ace 3 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno Ace 3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 1609.73% faster in the Antutu test (604034 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1700mAh).

Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno Ace 3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

Oppo Reno Ace 3 related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.33/5 of 3
Frequent comparisons