Compare Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 180544 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 162 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 155,2 x 73,9 x 7,9 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price | 222.84€ ($261.95) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A60’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 32Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A60 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 180544 score points which is 381.14% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 497 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 328.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1542 vs 604 (155.30% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 381.14% faster in the Antutu test (143020 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 32Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 700mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 22 grams less (140 vs 162).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Samsung Galaxy A60
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A60
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Global vs Samsung Galaxy A60
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A60 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 Play vs Samsung Galaxy A60
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro