Compare Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 277688 | 37524 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 6.0 |
Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal and plastic |
Weight | 203 g | 140 g |
Dimensions | 165 x 77,4 x 8,4 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB: Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus - Compare Samsung Galaxy A80 - Compare Samsung Galaxy A22s 5G 4/64GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A72’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 277688 score points which is 640.03% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 551 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 375.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1745 vs 604 (188.91% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 640.03% faster in the Antutu test (240164 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 63 grams less (140 vs 203).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A72 6/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A72
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro