0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Samsung Galaxy M02 with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Samsung Galaxy M02 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Samsung Galaxy M02 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 37699 37524
CPU MediaTek MT6739 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.5 " 5 "
Resolution 1600x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 2 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 32 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 6.0
Material Plastic Metal and plastic
Weight 206 g 140 g
Dimensions 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M02:
Samsung Galaxy M12 3/32GB - Compare
Samsung Galaxy A04s 3/32Gb - Compare
Samsung Galaxy A04 4/32GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M02’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Samsung Galaxy M02 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Samsung Galaxy M02 Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 5000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 30 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy M02 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37699 score points which is 0.47% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Samsung Galaxy M02 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 108 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is -6.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 341 vs 604 (-43.54% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M02 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M02 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 0.47% faster in the Antutu test (175 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M02 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 66 grams less (140 vs 206).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Samsung Galaxy M02 related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 20
Frequent comparisons