Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 511288 | 37524 |
CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic |
Weight | 222 g | 140 g |
Dimensions | 166,9 x 76 x 8,8 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
Price | 651.49€ ($698.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 511288 score points which is 1262.56% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 490 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 322.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2757 vs 604 (356.46% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1262.56% faster in the Antutu test (473764 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 82 grams less (140 vs 222).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Nokia X5 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro