Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | 
|---|---|---|
|   |   | |
| Antutu benchmark | 468775 | 37524 | 
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus | MediaTek MT6753 | 
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " | 
| Resolution | 2640x1200 | 1280x720 | 
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 | 
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb | 
| Bezel-less | Yes | No | 
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB | 
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | 
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp | 
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera | 
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 5 Mp | 
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 2800 mAh | 
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G | 
| WiFi | Yes | Yes | 
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | 
| NFC | Yes | No | 
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | 
| Notifications Led | No | Yes | 
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes | 
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 | 
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic | 
| Weight | 183 g | 140 g | 
| Dimensions | 167,3 x 73,6 x 7,2 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 
| Price | Discontinued. 
    View all Samsung models here Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: Samsung Galaxy S23+ 8/512GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M53 5G 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A04s 4/64Gb - Compare | Discontinued. 
    View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: | 
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | 
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp | 
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash | 
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 5 Mp | 
| Flash | No | No | 
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | 
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 2800 mAh | 
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable | 
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days | 
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days | 
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 5-6 hours | 
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours | 
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes | 
| Wireless charging | Yes | 
                         Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
 
                        Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
                    
                Samsung Galaxy Z Flip in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 468775 score points which is 1149.27% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 755 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 550.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2675 vs 604 (342.88% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1149.27% faster in the Antutu test (431251 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2640x1200 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 43 grams less (140 vs 183).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Samsung Galaxy S21
- Compare Apple iPhone 12 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Apple iPhone 12 Mini vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro