0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vivo X27 Pro with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.

Name Vivo X27 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Vivo X27 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Antutu benchmark 189335 37524
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size 6.38 " 5 "
Resolution 2340x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 256 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX586
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 6.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal and plastic
Weight 200 g 140 g
Dimensions 165,7 х 74,6 х 9 mm 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X27 Pro:
Vivo X70 Pro+ 8/256GB - Compare
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB - Compare
Vivo X Note 12/256GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vivo X27 Pro’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vivo X27 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX586
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vivo X27 Pro Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery 4000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 25 hours 20 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No

Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vivo X27 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 189335 score points which is 404.57% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vivo X27 Pro
6.38 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 710 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Vivo X27 Pro vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vivo X27 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 395 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 240.52% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1511 vs 604 (150.17% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vivo X27 Pro
6.38 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 710 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp Sony IMX586 / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Vivo X27 Pro and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X27 Pro (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 404.57% faster in the Antutu test (151811 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 13Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vivo X27 Pro (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Best weight: 60 grams less (140 vs 200).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vivo X27 Pro related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons