Compare Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326442 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX598 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 173 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 159.5 × 75.4 × 7.5 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X50 8/128Gb: Vivo S15 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Z8 5G - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X50’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX598 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX598 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X50 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326442 score points which is 769.96% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 621 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 435.34% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1833 vs 604 (203.48% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X50 8/128Gb and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X50 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 769.96% faster in the Antutu test (288918 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX598 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo X50 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 33 grams less (140 vs 173).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X60 vs Vivo X50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Vivo X50
- Compare Vivo X50 vs Vivo S9
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo X50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 Pro vs Vivo X50
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro