Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 301188 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 209 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76 x 8.8 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price | 182.00€ ($213.31) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 301188 score points which is 702.65% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 580 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 400.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1783 vs 604 (195.20% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 702.65% faster in the Antutu test (263664 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2360mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 69 grams less (140 vs 209).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Realme 8
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro