Compare ZTE Axon 11 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
| Name | ZTE Axon 11 5G | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 321778 | 37524 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.47 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic |
| Weight | 168 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all ZTE models here
Alternatives to the ZTE Axon 11 5G: ZTE Blade V40 Pro - Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7s Pro 18/512GB Global Version - Compare ZTE Axon 40 Pro 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
ZTE Axon 11 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the ZTE Axon 11 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | ZTE Axon 11 5G | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
ZTE Axon 11 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZTE Axon 11 5G vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | ZTE Axon 11 5G | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2800 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
ZTE Axon 11 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
ZTE Axon 11 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 321778 score points which is 757.53% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
ZTE Axon 11 5G vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
ZTE Axon 11 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 646 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 456.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2529 vs 604 (318.71% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between ZTE Axon 11 5G and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZTE Axon 11 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 757.53% faster in the Antutu test (284254 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).
Why it is better not to take ZTE Axon 11 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 28 grams less (140 vs 168).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
ZTE Axon 11 5G related comparisons
- Compare OnePlus 7 vs ZTE Axon 11 5G
- Compare Oppo Realme X2 Global vs ZTE Axon 11 5G
- Compare OnePlus 6T vs ZTE Axon 11 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs ZTE Axon 11 5G
- Compare Oppo Realme XT vs ZTE Axon 11 5G
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro