Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with Zopo Speed 7 Plus.
Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	Zopo Speed 7 Plus

Antutu benchmark	37524
CPU	MediaTek MT6753	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	2800 mAh	3000 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0
Material	Metal and plastic
Weight	140 g	g
Dimensions	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:	Discontinued. View all Zopo models here Alternatives to the Zopo Speed 7 Plus:

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	Zopo Speed 7 Plus
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	Zopo Speed 7 Plus
Battery	2800 mAh	3000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours
Talk time	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Zopo Speed 7 Plus, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

Zopo Speed 7 Plus

5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Zopo Speed 7 Plus: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Zopo Speed 7 Plus which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

Zopo Speed 7 Plus

5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Zopo Speed 7 Plus? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Zopo Speed 7 Plus (advantages)

Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Zopo Speed 7 Plus (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Zopo Speed 7 Plus related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.61/5 of 425

Frequent comparisons