Compare Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101
| Name | Vivo IQOO 12 Pro | FOSSiBOT F101 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2017337 | 102778 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 16 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 24 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | OmniVision OV50H | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 205 g | 350 g |
| Dimensions | 164.63 x 75.4 x 8.58 mm | 155.7 x 76.2 x 20.35 mm |
| Price | 724.91€ ($834.76) See Details | 78.55€ ($90.45) See Details |
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 12 Pro’s camera vs FOSSiBOT F101’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp OmniVision OV50H sensor and the 24Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 12 Pro | FOSSiBOT F101 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 24 Mp |
| Sensor model | OmniVision OV50H | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 12 Pro | FOSSiBOT F101 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2017337 score points which is 1862.81% faster than the FOSSiBOT F101, which got 102778. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2611 points score in "Single-core" of against the FOSSiBOT F101 which got 165, it is 1482.42% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6339 vs 638 (893.57% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 12 Pro and FOSSiBOT F101? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 12 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1862.81% faster in the Antutu test (1914559 score difference).
- Best weight: 145 grams less (205 vs 350).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp OmniVision OV50H compared to 24Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1440x720.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 12 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the FOSSiBOT F101 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 5500mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take FOSSiBOT F101 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO 12 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X100 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 12 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 13 vs Vivo IQOO 12 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs Vivo X100 Pro+
- Compare Vivo IQOO 12 Pro vs Xiaomi 14
FOSSiBOT F101 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP22 vs FOSSiBOT F101
- Compare OUKITEL WP23 vs FOSSiBOT F101
- Compare FOSSiBOT F101 vs OUKITEL WP5 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV5300 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101
- Compare FOSSiBOT F101 vs OUKITEL WP20