Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Coolpad 7320
Name | Vivo IQOO 3 | Coolpad 7320 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 588883 | |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | |
Diagonal size | 6.44 " | " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
RAM | 8 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | |
ROM | 128 GB | GB |
External memory | No | |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4440 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | |
Weight | 214 g | g |
Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.9 x 9.2 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 3: Vivo iQOO Z1 8/256GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Z1 6/128GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 8 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Coolpad models here
Alternatives to the Coolpad 7320: Coolpad Cool 20 4/128GB - Compare Coolpad Cool 20 6/128GB - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 3 vs Coolpad 7320: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 3’s camera vs Coolpad 7320’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vivo IQOO 3 | Coolpad 7320 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Vivo IQOO 3 vs Coolpad 7320: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 3 vs Coolpad 7320, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vivo IQOO 3 | Coolpad 7320 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4440 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging | No |
Vivo IQOO 3 vs Coolpad 7320: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 588883 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Coolpad 7320, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 3 vs Coolpad 7320: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the Coolpad 7320 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 3 and Coolpad 7320? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 3 (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 3 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Coolpad 7320 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Coolpad 7320 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 3 related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs OnePlus 8
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Xiaomi Mi 10
- Compare Vivo IQOO Pro vs Vivo IQOO 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K30i
Coolpad 7320 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global
- Compare UMIDIGI F1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Global