Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 671218 | 21166 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 197 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price | 726.39€ ($837.86) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL WP10 - Compare OUKITEL WP8 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP60 12/256Gb - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671218 score points which is 3071.21% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 1321.54% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3351 vs 222 (1409.46% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3071.21% faster in the Antutu test (650052 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 600mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 21 grams less (176 vs 197).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G 12/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G vs Vivo Y70s
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G vs Vivo S5
- Compare Vivo S15 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z1
- Compare Vivo IQOO 7 vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 5G
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11