Compare Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 671113 | 21166 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 196 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB: Vivo IQOO Neo7 Pro 5G - Compare Vivo X90 Pro 8/256GB - Compare Vivo X90s - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL WP18 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP18 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 Pro - Compare |
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671113 score points which is 3070.71% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 923 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 1320.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3346 vs 222 (1407.21% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3070.71% faster in the Antutu test (649947 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 1100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 20 grams less (176 vs 196).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO 5 12/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 vs Vivo Y3s
- Compare Vivo X60 Pro Plus vs Vivo IQOO 5
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 vs Vivo X21
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11