Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1086793 | 21166 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 197 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 164,81 x 76,9 x 8,85 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price | 388.59€ ($451.64) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL C35 - Compare OUKITEL WP16 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 3/32Gb - Compare |
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX766 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1086793 score points which is 5034.62% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1282 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 1872.31% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4283 vs 222 (1829.28% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 5034.62% faster in the Antutu test (1065627 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX766 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 21 grams less (176 vs 197).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs Vivo IQOO 7
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition vs Vivo IQOO Neo 7 SE
- Compare OnePlus 11R vs Vivo IQOO Neo 7 Racing Edition
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11