Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB | Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1098793 | 35060 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3120 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 202 g | 135 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 76,9 x 8,5 mm | 139.5 x 70.4 x 8.5 mm |
| Price | 381.80€ ($443.33) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb: Xiaomi 12 Lite 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro 12/512GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro - Compare |
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Neo7’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX766 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB | Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX766 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Neo7 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB | Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3120 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1098793 score points which is 3034.04% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb, which got 35060. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1289 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb which got 85, it is 1416.47% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4287 vs 402 (966.42% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB and Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3034.04% faster in the Antutu test (1063733 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX766 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3120mAh (a difference of 1880mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 67 grams less (135 vs 202).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO 9T vs Vivo IQOO Neo7
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 vs Vivo IQOO Neo
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 vs Vivo iQOO Z8 5G
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 vs Vivo IQOO Neo5 Lite
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi 4A 2/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs UMIDIGI C Note
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Xiaomi Mi5
- Compare Leagoo M5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A