Compare Vivo V40 Pro vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Vivo V40 Pro | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1277934 | 21166 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2800 x 1260 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX921 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 192 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 164.36 x 75.1 x 7.58 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo V40 Pro: Vivo X90s - Compare Vivo X70 Pro 12/512GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 7 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL K12 6/64Gb - Compare OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare OUKITEL Y4800 - Compare |
Vivo V40 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo V40 Pro’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX921 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo V40 Pro | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX921 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo V40 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo V40 Pro vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo V40 Pro | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo V40 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo V40 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1277934 score points which is 5937.67% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo V40 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo V40 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1998 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 2973.85% faster. In "Multi-core" score 5488 vs 222 (2372.07% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo V40 Pro and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo V40 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 5937.67% faster in the Antutu test (1256768 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX921 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2800 x 1260 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 2100mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo V40 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 16 grams less (176 vs 192).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo V40 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X100 vs Vivo V40 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Vivo V40 Pro
- Compare Vivo V40 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7
- Compare Vivo IQOO 12 vs Vivo V40 Pro
- Compare Vivo V40 Pro vs Vivo X90 Pro
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11