Compare Vivo X Fold5 vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Vivo X Fold5 | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1784832 | 21166 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 8.03 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX921 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 217 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 159.68 x 72.6 x 9.2 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X Fold5: Vivo X70 Pro+ 12/256GB - Compare Vivo X90 12/512GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 12/512GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL K16 - Compare OUKITEL WP62 8/256Gb - Compare OUKITEL WP5 4/32Gb - Compare |
Vivo X Fold5 vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X Fold5’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX921 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X Fold5 | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX921 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X Fold5 vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X Fold5 vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X Fold5 | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Vivo X Fold5 vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X Fold5 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1784832 score points which is 8332.54% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X Fold5 vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X Fold5 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2544 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 3813.85% faster. In "Multi-core" score 7146 vs 222 (3118.92% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X Fold5 and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X Fold5 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 8332.54% faster in the Antutu test (1763666 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX921 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2480x2200 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 2600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X Fold5 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 41 grams less (176 vs 217).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Vivo X Fold5 related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X Fold5 vs Vivo X Fold
- Compare Vivo X Fold5 vs Vivo X Note
- Compare Vivo X Fold5 vs Vivo X50 Pro+
- Compare Vivo X Fold5 vs Vivo X70 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 12 vs Vivo X Fold5
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11