Compare Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11

Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vivo X200 Pro with OUKITEL C11.
Name	Vivo X200 Pro	OUKITEL C11

Antutu benchmark	3014099	21166
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 9400	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	6.78 "	5.45 "
Resolution	2800 x 1260	960x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	2
RAM	12 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	Yes
ROM	256 GB	8 GB
External memory	No	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	50 Mp	5 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model	Sony LYT-818
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	2 Mp
Battery	6000 mAh	3400 mAh
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Network	5 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 15	Android 8.1
Material	Metal frame and glass case	Plastic
Weight	223 g	176 g
Dimensions	162.37 x 75.95 x 8.2 mm	146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm
Price	566.29€ ($664.77) See Details	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL C31 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP1 - Compare OUKITEL WP300 - Compare

Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vivo X200 Pro’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT-818 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vivo X200 Pro	OUKITEL C11
Rear camera	50 Mp	5 Mp
Sensor model	Sony LYT-818
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	2 Mp
Flash	No	No

Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vivo X200 Pro	OUKITEL C11
Battery	6000 mAh	3400 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	30 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	Yes	No

Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vivo X200 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 3014099 score points which is 14140.29% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vivo X200 Pro

6.78 inches (2800 x 1260) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 9400 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony LYT-818 / 6000mAh

566.29€

$664.77

3014099

OUKITEL C11

5.45" (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 5Mp / 3400mAh

33.52€

$39.35

21166

Vivo X200 Pro vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vivo X200 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2866 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 4309.23% faster. In "Multi-core" score 9980 vs 222 (4395.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vivo X200 Pro

6.78 inches (2800 x 1260) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 9400 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony LYT-818 / 6000mAh

566.29€

$664.77

2866 / 9980

OUKITEL C11

5.45" (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 5Mp / 3400mAh

33.52€

$39.35

65 / 222

What is the difference between Vivo X200 Pro and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X200 Pro (advantages)

Good performance: Is 14140.29% faster in the Antutu test (2992933 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony LYT-818 compared to 5Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2800 x 1260 vs 960x480.
More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 2600mAh).
Have water resistant supports.
Have wireless charging supports.
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vivo X200 Pro (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)

Best weight: 47 grams less (176 vs 223).
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.
Does not have wireless charging support.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Vivo X200 Pro related comparisons

OUKITEL C11 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons