Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | Vivo X200 Ultra | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 3031665 | 21166 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.82 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT-818 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 229 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 163.14 x 76.76 x 8.69 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X200 Ultra: Vivo IQOO 10 Pro 12/512GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo7 8/128GB - Compare Vivo X50 Pro+ 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL C21 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP5 3/32Gb - Compare OUKITEL K12 6/64Gb - Compare |
Vivo X200 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X200 Ultra’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT-818 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X200 Ultra | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT-818 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X200 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X200 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X200 Ultra | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Vivo X200 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X200 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 3031665 score points which is 14223.28% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X200 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 3100 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 4669.23% faster. In "Multi-core" score 10095 vs 222 (4447.30% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X200 Ultra and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X200 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 14223.28% faster in the Antutu test (3010499 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony LYT-818 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3168x1440 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 2600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X200 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 53 grams less (176 vs 229).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Vivo X200 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
- Compare Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Ultra
- Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- Compare Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
- Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X70 Pro+
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11