Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Name | Vivo X200 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 3031665 | 389668 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) | MediaTek Helio G99 |
Diagonal size | 6.82 " | 6.7 " |
Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2340x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Sony LYT-818 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 5 G | 5 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 229 g | 190 g |
Dimensions | 163.14 x 76.76 x 8.69 mm | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X200 Ultra: Vivo IQOO 12 - Compare Vivo X Fold 12/256GB - Compare Vivo X200 Pro - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A70 8/128Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 12/256GB - Compare |
Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X200 Ultra’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT-818 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vivo X200 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony LYT-818 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vivo X200 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X200 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 3031665 score points which is 678.01% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, which got 389668. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X200 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 3100 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G which got 564, it is 449.65% faster. In "Multi-core" score 10095 vs 1854 (444.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X200 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A17 4G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X200 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 678.01% faster in the Antutu test (2641997 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3168x1440 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X200 Ultra (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (advantages)
- Best weight: 39 grams less (190 vs 229).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo X200 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
- Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- Compare Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
- Compare Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Ultra
- Compare Vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X70 Pro+
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A17 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G