Compare Vivo X200s vs OUKITEL Original Pure
| Name | Vivo X200s | OUKITEL Original Pure |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2918879 | |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | MediaTek MT6582 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2800 x 1260 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX921 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 1850 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 5 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | |
| Weight | 203 g | g |
| Dimensions | 160.01 x 74.29 x 7.99 mm | mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X200s: Vivo IQOO Neo6 8/128GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 10 Pro 12/512GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL Original Pure: OUKITEL WP12 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C32 - Compare OUKITEL C15 Pro + - Compare |
Vivo X200s vs OUKITEL Original Pure: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X200s’s camera vs OUKITEL Original Pure’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX921 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X200s | OUKITEL Original Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX921 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Vivo X200s vs OUKITEL Original Pure: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X200s vs OUKITEL Original Pure, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X200s | OUKITEL Original Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 1850 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Vivo X200s vs OUKITEL Original Pure: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X200s in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2918879 score points which is 100.00% faster than the OUKITEL Original Pure, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X200s vs OUKITEL Original Pure: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X200s in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2877 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL Original Pure which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 9215 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X200s and OUKITEL Original Pure? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X200s (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony IMX921 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2800 x 1260 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 1850mAh (a difference of 4350mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X200s (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL Original Pure (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL Original Pure (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo X200s related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X200 Pro Mini vs Vivo X200s
- Compare Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X200s
- Compare Vivo X200 vs Vivo X200s
- Compare Vivo X200s vs Vivo IQOO 12 Pro
- Compare Vivo X200s vs Vivo S15e
OUKITEL Original Pure related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi Mi 9 T
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Xiaomi Mi 9 T
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 vs Xiaomi Mi 9 T
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 T vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Global