0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version with Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition.

Name Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition
Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition
Antutu benchmark 1087955 743884
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 7000
Diagonal size 6.73 " 6.67 "
Resolution 3200x1440 2400x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 12 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 256 GB 128 GB
External memory No No
Rear camera 50 Mp 64 Mp
Camera Four cameras Triple Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX989 Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 16 Mp
Battery 4860 mAh 5180 mAh
Wireless charging Yes No
Network 5 G 5 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 12 Android 12
Material Metal frame and glass case Metal frame and glass case
Weight 225 g g
Dimensions 163,2 x 75 x 9,1 mm mm
  Price 606.99€ ($713.53) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition:
Xiaomi 12 8/256Gb - Compare
Xiaomi Poco M4 5G 6/128GB - Compare
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 8/256GB - Compare

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi 12S Ultra’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony IMX989 sensor and the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition
Rear camera 50 Mp 64 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX989 Sony IMX686
Flash Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp 16 Mp
Flash No No

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition
Battery 4860 mAh 5180 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging Yes No

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition: Antutu benchmark comparison. Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1087955 score points which is 46.25% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition, which got 743884. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version
6.73 inches (3200x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony IMX989 / 4860mAh
606.99€
$713.53
 
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Dimensity 7000 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 5180mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1297 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition which got 967, it is 34.13% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4286 vs 3458 (23.94% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version
6.73 inches (3200x1440) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony IMX989 / 4860mAh
606.99€
$713.53
 
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition
6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Dimensity 7000 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 5180mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version and Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 46.25% faster in the Antutu test (344071 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Omnivision OV32C vs 16Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 2400x1080.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have wireless charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 50Mp Sony IMX989
  • More battery capacity: 5180mAh vs 4860mAh (a difference of 320mAh).

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have wireless charging support.

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have infrared blaster supports.

Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi K50 Game Standard Edition related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons