Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi 14T Pro | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 2215737 | 276448 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Omnivision OVX9000 (Light Hunter 900) | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 209 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 160,4 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi 14T Pro: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G 6/128GB - Compare |
314.50€ ($363.07) See Details |
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Omnivision OVX9000 (Light Hunter 900) sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi 14T Pro | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Omnivision OVX9000 (Light Hunter 900) | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi 14T Pro | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi 14T Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 2215737 score points which is 701.50% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi 14T Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2533 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 405.59% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6257 vs 1986 (215.06% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi 14T Pro and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi 14T Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 701.50% faster in the Antutu test (1939289 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Omnivision OVX9000 (Light Hunter 900) compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2712x1220 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi 14T Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 70 grams less (139 vs 209).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi 14T Pro related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi 15T Pro vs Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi 14
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Compare Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo Reno 13 Pro
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact