Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb vs Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb | Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 786443 | 128944 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | JLQ JR510 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.71 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1650x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 220 g | 203 g |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.4 x 9.9 mm | 169.6 x 76.6 x 9.1 mm |
| Price | 484.13€ ($567.77) See Details | 60.23€ ($70.63) See Details |
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb vs Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C40’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW3 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb | Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb vs Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C40, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb | Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb vs Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 786443 score points which is 509.91% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb, which got 128944. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb vs Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1157 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb which got 242, it is 378.10% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3798 vs 985 (285.58% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb and Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 509.91% faster in the Antutu test (657499 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW3 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp Samsung S5K3T2 vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1650x720.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 17 grams less (203 vs 220).
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro 12/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3
- Compare Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi Note 11 Pro
Xiaomi Poco C40 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs Xiaomi Poco C40
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10A
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C40