Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB | Xiaomi POCO C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 767944 | 381441 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.88 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1650x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 14 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 218 g | 205 g |
| Dimensions | 163.8 × 76.2 × 10 mm | 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm |
| Price | 326.63€ ($379.99) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G: Xiaomi 12S 12/256 Chinese version - Compare Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 GT 8/256GB - Compare |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark 5’s camera vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW3 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB | Xiaomi POCO C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB | Xiaomi POCO C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 767944 score points which is 101.33% faster than the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G, which got 381441. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB vs Xiaomi POCO C75 5G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 919 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G which got 842, it is 9.14% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3326 vs 1901 (74.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB and Xiaomi POCO C75 5G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 101.33% faster in the Antutu test (386503 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW3 compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1650x720.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCO C75 5G (advantages)
- Best weight: 13 grams less (205 vs 218).
- More battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 4650mAh (a difference of 510mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCO C75 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Asus ROG Phone 5
- Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Apple iPhone 11 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
Xiaomi POCO C75 5G related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M5
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M5s
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C75 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G