Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB vs Xiaomi Poco C50
Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB | Xiaomi Poco C50 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 767944 | 101655 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.52 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1600x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4650 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | Android 12 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 218 g | 192 g |
Dimensions | 163.8 × 76.2 × 10 mm | 164.9 x 76.75 x 9.09 mm |
Price | 441.61€ ($459.58) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C50: Xiaomi 13 Ultra 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 12/256Gb - Compare |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB vs Xiaomi Poco C50: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark 5’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C50’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW3 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB | Xiaomi Poco C50 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GW3 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB vs Xiaomi Poco C50: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Xiaomi Poco C50, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB | Xiaomi Poco C50 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4650 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB vs Xiaomi Poco C50: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 767944 score points which is 655.44% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C50, which got 101655. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB vs Xiaomi Poco C50: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 919 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C50 which got 152, it is 504.61% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3326 vs 636 (422.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB and Xiaomi Poco C50? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 655.44% faster in the Antutu test (666289 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW3 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1600x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C50 (advantages)
- Best weight: 26 grams less (192 vs 218).
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4650mAh (a difference of 350mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C50 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi 12T vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Compare Xiaomi 12T Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K50 Universe vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5
Xiaomi Poco C50 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi 12S vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Blackview BV9200 vs Xiaomi Poco C50
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C31 vs Xiaomi Poco C50