Compare Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb vs Oppo Reno 4F
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb | Oppo Reno 4F |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 293280 | 206923 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| Diagonal size | 6.01 " | 6.43 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 10 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX586 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 190 g | 164 g |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75,26 x 8,7 mm | 160.14 x 73.7 x 7.48 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb: Xiaomi 12X 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Civi 12/256Gb - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno 4F: Oppo Find X3 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Oppo Reno6 8/128GB - Compare Oppo Reno7 5G CN 12/256GB - Compare |
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb vs Oppo Reno 4F: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Black Shark Helo’s camera vs Oppo Reno 4F’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb | Oppo Reno 4F |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX586 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb vs Oppo Reno 4F: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Black Shark Helo vs Oppo Reno 4F, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb | Oppo Reno 4F |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb vs Oppo Reno 4F: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 293280 score points which is 41.73% faster than the Oppo Reno 4F, which got 206923. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb vs Oppo Reno 4F: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 414 points score in "Single-core" of against the Oppo Reno 4F which got 403, it is 2.73% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2255 vs 1485 (51.85% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb and Oppo Reno 4F? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 41.73% faster in the Antutu test (86357 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 16Mp .
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 4F (advantages)
- Best weight: 26 grams less (164 vs 190).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 4F (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo 10/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Helo
- Compare OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition vs Xiaomi Black Shark Helo
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark Helo vs Xiaomi Poco M3
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark Helo vs Xiaomi Mi6X
- Compare Xiaomi Black Shark Helo vs Xiaomi CC9
Oppo Reno 4F related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Oppo A95
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Realme 8
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Oppo A54 4G
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Oppo A93 vs Oppo Reno 4F