Compare Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Xiaomi CC11 Pro | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 505499 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.55 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4150 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 157 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC11 Pro: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 8/256Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K60 12/512GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30S 8/256Gb - Compare |
317.52€ ($368.86) See Details |
Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC11 Pro’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC11 Pro | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC11 Pro | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4150 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC11 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 505499 score points which is 82.86% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC11 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 856 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 70.86% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2196 vs 1986 (10.57% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC11 Pro and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC11 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 82.86% faster in the Antutu test (229051 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4150mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1650mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC11 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 18 grams less (139 vs 157).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi CC11 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi CC11 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 vs Xiaomi CC11 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC11 Pro vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact