Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Ulefone Armor 9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 263117 | 224199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| Diagonal size | 6.47 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Five cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | Samsung GW1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 208 g | 320 g |
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm |
| Price | 370.63€ ($430.09) See Details | 330.95€ ($384.05) See Details |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 9’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Ulefone Armor 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | Samsung GW1 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Ulefone Armor 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 263117 score points which is 17.36% faster than the Ulefone Armor 9, which got 224199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 549 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 9 which got 416, it is 31.97% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1771 vs 1534 (15.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb and Ulefone Armor 9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 17.36% faster in the Antutu test (38918 score difference).
- Best weight: 112 grams less (208 vs 320).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 64Mp Samsung GW1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5260mAh (a difference of 1340mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 10X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Max vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
Ulefone Armor 9 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 9