Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Vivo Y50 4/128Gb
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Vivo Y50 4/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 263117 | 168544 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 6.47 " | 6.53 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Five cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 208 g | 197 g |
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 74.2 x 9.7 mm | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm |
| Price | 419.71€ ($430.09) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo Y50 4/128Gb: Vivo X Note 12/512GB - Compare Vivo X70 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 7 SE 8/128GB - Compare |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Vivo Y50 4/128Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9 Pro’s camera vs Vivo Y50’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Vivo Y50 4/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Vivo Y50 4/128Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Vivo Y50, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb | Vivo Y50 4/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5260 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Vivo Y50 4/128Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 263117 score points which is 56.11% faster than the Vivo Y50 4/128Gb, which got 168544. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb vs Vivo Y50 4/128Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 549 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vivo Y50 4/128Gb which got 318, it is 72.64% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1771 vs 1387 (27.69% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb and Vivo Y50 4/128Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 56.11% faster in the Antutu test (94573 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung ISOCELL Bright HMX compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 16Mp .
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 5260mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 260mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo Y50 4/128Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 11 grams less (197 vs 208).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo Y50 4/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi CC9 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 Pro vs Huawei Honor 10X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Max vs Xiaomi CC9 Pro
Vivo Y50 4/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vivo Y20 vs Vivo Y50
- Compare Oppo A53 vs Vivo Y50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Vivo Y50
- Compare Vivo V20 vs Vivo Y50
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 vs Vivo Y50