Compare Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 179211 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.39 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4030 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 179 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 156.8 х 74.5 х 8.67 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb: Xiaomi Redmi 9A 6/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11s 6/64Gb NFC - Compare Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 6/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 3W: Ulefone Armor X7 - Compare Ulefone Armor X3 - Compare Ulefone Note 7P - Compare |
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3W’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9 vs Ulefone Armor 3W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4030 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 179211 score points which is 20.93% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3W, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 313 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3W which got 320, it is -2.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1444 vs 1475 (-2.10% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb and Ulefone Armor 3W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 20.93% faster in the Antutu test (31012 score difference).
- Best weight: 185 grams less (179 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3W (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4030mAh (a difference of 6270mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3W (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi CC9 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A3 vs Xiaomi CC9
- Compare Huawei Honor V20 vs Xiaomi CC9
- Compare Doogee S90 vs Xiaomi CC9
- Compare Xiaomi CC9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
- Compare Elephone U3H vs Xiaomi CC9
Ulefone Armor 3W related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs Ulefone Armor 3W