Compare Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Cubot Pocket
| Name | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 147114 | 137655 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | UNISOC Tiger T310 |
| Diagonal size | 6.09 " | 4 " |
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 1080x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4030 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 11 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 174 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm | 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: Xiaomi Black Shark 4 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 12C 4/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s 4/128GB - Compare |
75.13€ ($87.24) See Details |
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Cubot Pocket: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi CC9e’s camera vs Cubot Pocket’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Cubot Pocket: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi CC9e vs Cubot Pocket, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4030 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Cubot Pocket: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 147114 score points which is 6.87% faster than the Cubot Pocket, which got 137655. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb vs Cubot Pocket: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 310 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Pocket which got 295, it is 5.08% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1340 vs 1012 (32.41% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb and Cubot Pocket? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 6.87% faster in the Antutu test (9459 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1080x540.
- More battery capacity: 4030mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1030mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)
- Best weight: 25 grams less (149 vs 174).
- NFC supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi CC9e vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e
Cubot Pocket related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Soyes XS12